The Lucas Museum Decision: In Their Own Words

For posterity, here is the full announcement from the Lucas Museum that it will not locate in Chicago, followed by the response from Friends of the Parks, and the response from the Mayor’s office.

Lucas Museum Statement

Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Withdraws from Chicago

Museum will be built in California

The Lucas Museum of Narrative Art announced today that in light of extensive delays caused by Friends of the Parks, Chicago will no longer be considered a potential site for the museum.  The Board of Directors and executive leadership of the museum confirmed that California will be its future home.

“No one benefits from continuing their seemingly endless litigation to protest a parking lot,” said George W. Lucas, founder and chairman of the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art.  “the actions initiated by friends of the Parks and their recent attempts to extract concessions from the city have effectively overridden approvals received from numerous democratically elected bodies of government.”

The location – a parking lot near Soldier Field – was originally selected by Chicago’s Site Selection Task Force in May 2014 and subsequently approved by the city council, Park District, Plan Commission, Department of Zoning, Illinois General Assembly and the governor.  When the city offered McCormick Place East as an alternative to the parking lot, Friends of the Parks announced plans to block consideration of that location as well as any lakefront slate or park in Chicago.

On behalf of his wife, Mellody Hobson, and other members of the Lucas Museum of Narrative Art Board of Directors, Mr. Lucas expressed gratitude to the many people throughout the community worked tirelessly to bring the institution to life on Chicago’s Museum Campus.  “We are deeply appreciative to Mayor Rahm Emanuel, Governor Bruce Rauner and countless others for all the time and effort they invested in trying to secure the museum for Chicago,” Said Mr. Lucas.

The education-focused public institution remains dedicated to expanding public understanding and appreciation of narrative art in all its forms, providing inspiration and learning, especially for young people.

Mr. Lucas stated, “While Chicago will not be home to the museum, my wife and I will continue to enthusiastically support a wide variety of educational and cultural activities throughout the city.”

Friends of the Parks Response

Friends of the Parks’ Lucas Museum Departure Statement

“It is unfortunate that the Lucas Museum has made the decision to leave Chicago rather than locate the museum on one of the several alternative sites that are not on Chicago’s lakefront. That would have been the true win-win,” said Friends of the Parks Executive Director Juanita Irizarry and Board Chair Lauren Moltz.

Mayor’s Office Statement

STATEMENT FROM MAYOR RAHM EMANUEL ON THE LUCAS MUSEUM OF NARRATIVE ART

“Two years ago to the day, George Lucas and Mellody Hobson announced that they had chosen
Chicago as the site of their incredible legacy investment. The opportunity for a City to gain a brand
new museum is rare, and this particular opportunity – a gift worth approximately $1.5 billion –
would have been the largest philanthropic contribution in Chicago’s history.

Unfortunately, time has run out and the moment we’ve consistently warned about has arrived –
Chicago’s loss will be another city’s gain. This missed opportunity has not only cost us what will be
a world-class cultural institution, it has cost thousands of jobs for Chicago workers, millions of
dollars in economic investment and countless educational opportunities for Chicago’s youth.

Despite widespread support of the project from Chicago’s cultural, business, labor, faith and
community leaders and the public, a legal challenge filed by Friends of the Parks threatened to
derail this once-in-a-generation opportunity.

We tried to find common ground to resolve the lawsuit – the sole barrier preventing the start of the
museum’s construction. But despite our best efforts to negotiate a common solution that would
keep this tremendous cultural and economic asset in Chicago, Friends of the Parks chose to instead
negotiate with themselves while Lucas negotiated with cities on the West Coast.”

 

Related Articles

Draft North Branch Framework Breezes Through Approval Process If it seems like it took just ten days for the city's North Branch Industrial Corridor Framework to go from "draft" status to "approved" by the Chicag...
City’s North Branch Crystal Ball Getting Clearer The future of Chicago is today, now that the city has released its draft North Branch Industrial Plan, outlining the expansion of high-density downtow...
Lucas Museum Gets Design Update, Still Not Coming to Chicago The day after the Obama Foundation unveiled its preliminary design for the Obama Presidential Center's Jackson Park campus, the Lucas Museum unveiled ...
The Empire Strikes Back: Lucas Museum Returning To Chicago After losing a hard-fought battle to land his Lucas Museum of Narrative Art in the Windy City, Hollywood Director George Lucas has unveiled what can o...
Editor

Author: Editor

Editor founded the Chicago Architecture Blog in 2003, after a long career in journalism. He can be reached at chicagoarchitectureinfo@gmail.com.

Share This Post On

2 Comments

  1. Thanks for NOTHING ‘Friends of the Parking lots.’
    We can now enjoy that beautiful asphalt parking lot forever and ever, Chicago’s loss is California’s gain.

    Post a Reply
    • I’ve tried to understand the lawsuit brought by FoTP. I just can’t. Why is it a good thing to preserve a parking lot? I could understand if this museum was going to take actual, functional park space. Open areas are a treasure in the city and we should do what’s reasonable to protect them. But a parking lot? This whole thing is absurd. What a shame.

      Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.