Two Tower Project To Replace the Chicago Spire Goes to Plan Commission With An Unusual Condition

The 35-year saga of 400 North Lake Shore Drive may finally come to a conclusion soon, as this week the Chicago Plan Commission is scheduled to consider the latest proposal for the property on the northwest corner of the Chicago River and Lake Michigan.

March 2020 rendering of 400 North Lake Shore Drive (Courtesy of Related Midwest)

The location is perfect for a prominent, eye-catching trophy tower, and even in the mid-1980’s drew proposals for buildings as tall as 78 stories.  But it was 2006 which saw the race to the sky shift into overdrive with a 1,500-foot-tall proposal, that was followed by a 2,000-foot-tall proposal, that was followed by… the big hole in the ground half-full of water that we have today.

The site is now owned by Related Midwest, which wants this dog to get a wiggle on and put up a two-tower proposal that is modest compared to almost every single previous notion for this space. But it’s still a bold enough plan to leave some Streeterville NIMBYs in a shivering, pearl-clutching panic. Because of that, it’s been revised several times, always downward, to what will be presented at the Commission meeting on Thursday: A pair of residential towers 875 and 765 feet tall.  

Opponents of this project can’t complain about the height or its potential for blocking views because it would be all pots and kettles pointing fingers at one another.  Instead, they mostly complain about the traffic problems they believe the project will cause.  Remarkably, there are people living in Streeterville who don’t realize this isn’t Lisle, and think it’s perfectly reasonable to have two (or more!) cars in the most densely populated neighborhood in the Midwest.  It’s the same sort of mental disconnect that allows your neighbor to rationalize keeping a 150-pound Alaskan Malamute in his studio apartment.  

Because of this, 42nd Ward Alderman Brendan Reilly has put an interesting safety valve in the zoning for this property.  He not only wants one tower to be built at a time, he wants there to be a pause between the construction of the two so that a study can be done to determine the impact the first one had on traffic before putting up the second building.  If things don’t work out well, that could mean changes to the second half of the project.

Location: 400 North Lake Shore Drive, Streeterville

Editor

Author: Editor

Editor founded the Chicago Architecture Blog in 2003, after a long career in journalism. He can be reached at chicagoarchitectureinfo@gmail.com.

Share This Post On

3 Comments

  1. That “build one at a time” idea is as idiotic as the nimbys. The way I see this going is we end up with a half-built development instead of the twin towers that work well with each other. Look at most other two tower projects in Chicago: ABN building in the west loop, The New York Private Residences in lakeview, and so far the NOMA building in the south loop. The second tower doesn’t get built and the proposal for the other half of the land doesn’t fit with anything around, and certainly not the original tower. Riley is stupid and bad for downtown. When has he ever supported a good design and kept it good vs making it a substandard one?

    Post a Reply
  2. With global warming you’d think there would be LESS cars in Chicago. I guess no one believes in it here, I mean we have public transportation, why do these ivory tower types have planet killers?

    Post a Reply
  3. the thing I fear most is the potential of 400 north lake shore drive site being filled with a mediocre building or rather not meeting its full potential with the already redesigned building. that is prime real estate that should be used to construct something amazing and not HALF of a project. the request is completely nuts and maybe more embarrassing than the whole already in the ground. those twin towers should be grand and show off, still amazing architecture, unfortunately, is at the mercy of those with power. it seems alderman Reily might let us down with this one. disappointed Chicagoan

    Post a Reply

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Human Verification: In order to verify that you are a human and not a spam bot, please enter the answer into the following box below based on the instructions contained in the graphic.